Company records and public announcements
Oracle Recruiting
GlobalOracle Corporation · Listed company
Same owner: Oracle Corporation. Oracle Recruiting and Oracle Taleo are sold by the same company.
Oracle Recruiting is a global recruitment system, headquartered in United States. 16 Swedish employers and 124 job ads over 90 days to 20 Sep 2026 point to this system, measured from public job ads. As of 20 Sep 2026.
- Country of origin
- United States
- Other names in use
- Oracle Recruiting Cloud, Oracle Fusion Recruiting, ORC
- Headquarters
- United States
- Legal entity
- Not researched yet
- LinkedIn partner tier
- Platinum · checked 5 Aug 2026A LinkedIn partner tier is a commercial arrangement with LinkedIn, not a quality rating. It affects neither the sorting nor the selector.
- Vendor website
- www.oracle.com
Measured in Swedish job ad data
16
Swedish employers, 90 days to 20 Sep 2026
As of 20 Sep 2026
16 confirmed, counted as employers
124
ads through the system, 90 days to 20 Sep 2026
As of 20 Sep 2026
124 confirmed, counted as ads
0.2% av 77,567
share of attributed ads
As of 20 Sep 2026
of 77,567 attributed ads
0% av 16
share that are public sector employers
As of 20 Sep 2026
Counted among the employers we can attribute a system to at all, not among all Swedish employers.
This figure counts employers.
0% of the employers behind this figure are staffing or recruitment firms. For 100% we do not know.
We publish the counts but no ranking. Ranking would mean knowing how many ads we miss, and most of the sites we cannot attribute also decline to be read by a crawler - so that figure is unmeasured, not good or bad. The method page explains it.
Measured in Swedish job ad data
How many Swedish employers run Oracle Recruiting
16 employers have public job ads over 90 days to 20 Sep 2026 that point to Oracle Recruiting. Measured from the ads, not self-reported.
We do not publish the list of employers behind this figure. To find out which system a company runs, look that company up by name or by its registration number.
Counted among the employers we can attribute a system to at all, not among all Swedish employers.
Check a single employerMeasured in Swedish job ad data
Where the system is used
Occupation fields in the ads
- Engineering and technical41.1%
- Installation and maintenance12.9%
- Data and IT12.1%
- Managers and executives6.5%
- Industrial manufacturing4.8%
Av 124 klassificerade annonser.
Counties in the ads
- Norrbottens län26.6%
- Skåne län19.4%
- Södermanlands län12.9%
- Dalarnas län11.3%
- Stockholms län11.3%
Av 124 klassificerade annonser.
0% of the employers behind this figure are public sector; the rest are private or unknown.
The measurement period is 90 days to 20 Sep 2026. The data runs from 22 Aug 2025 to 20 Sep 2026.
Company records and public announcements
What we know about this system
We have not researched this system yet. That says nothing about the system - only that we have not got to it. The registry researches the most widely used systems first.
A system without these fields has not been researched yet. That says nothing about the system.
Read the methodCompany records and public announcements
Similar systems
- SAP SuccessFactors RecruitingGlobal
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- Workday RecruitingGlobal
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- SmartRecruitersGlobal
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- GreenhouseGlobal
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- AshbyGlobal
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
Similarity is based on origin, size band and observed sector mix. It is not a ranking.
Same owner: SAP SE. SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and SmartRecruiters are sold by the same company.
Measured in Swedish job ad data
Where this comes from
Job ad data from public job boards and career sites.
Last recomputed 20 Sep 2026. Every figure here is derived from source data and recomputed on a schedule, never hand-edited.
No paid placement, no affiliate commission and no sponsored slots. The order on this page follows measured data or the alphabet, and nothing else.
The registry never claims that an employer does not use a particular system. We can name the system for well under half of employers, so a claim like that would often be wrong.
