Company records and public announcements
Powerinit JobPosition
Swedish-builtOwner not established
Powerinit JobPosition is a Swedish-built recruitment system, headquartered in Sweden, operated by Powerinit Sverige AB. 9 Swedish employers and 1,216 job ads over 90 days to 20 Sep 2026 point to this system, measured from public job ads. As of 20 Sep 2026.
- Country of origin
- Sweden
- Other names in use
- JobPosition, Powerinit Brand Management Center
- Headquarters
- Sweden
- Legal entity
- Powerinit Sverige AB
- LinkedIn partner tier
- Not listedA LinkedIn partner tier is a commercial arrangement with LinkedIn, not a quality rating. It affects neither the sorting nor the selector.
- Vendor website
- www.powerinit.com
Measured in Swedish job ad data
9
Swedish employers, 90 days to 20 Sep 2026
As of 20 Sep 2026
9 confirmed, counted as employers
1,216
ads through the system, 90 days to 20 Sep 2026
As of 20 Sep 2026
1,216 confirmed, counted as ads
1.6% av 77,567
share of attributed ads
As of 20 Sep 2026
of 77,567 attributed ads
44.4% av 9
share that are public sector employers
As of 20 Sep 2026
Counted among the employers we can attribute a system to at all, not among all Swedish employers.
This figure counts employers.
0% of the employers behind this figure are staffing or recruitment firms. For 100% we do not know.
We publish the counts but no ranking. Ranking would mean knowing how many ads we miss, and most of the sites we cannot attribute also decline to be read by a crawler - so that figure is unmeasured, not good or bad. The method page explains it.
Measured in Swedish job ad data
How many Swedish employers run Powerinit JobPosition
9 employers have public job ads over 90 days to 20 Sep 2026 that point to Powerinit JobPosition. Measured from the ads, not self-reported.
We do not publish the list of employers behind this figure. To find out which system a company runs, look that company up by name or by its registration number.
Counted among the employers we can attribute a system to at all, not among all Swedish employers.
Check a single employerMeasured in Swedish job ad data
Where the system is used
Occupation fields in the ads
- Healthcare66.7%
- Admin, finance and legal8.8%
- Managers and executives6.5%
- Social care4.7%
- Education2.9%
Av 1,216 klassificerade annonser.
Counties in the ads
- Uppsala län40.5%
- Jönköpings län27%
- Södermanlands län25.5%
- Kalmar län5.6%
- Blekinge län1.1%
Av 1,216 klassificerade annonser.
44.4% of the employers behind this figure are public sector; the rest are private or unknown.
The measurement period is 90 days to 20 Sep 2026. The data runs from 22 Aug 2025 to 20 Sep 2026.
Company records and public announcements
What we know about this system
We have not researched this system yet. That says nothing about the system - only that we have not got to it. The registry researches the most widely used systems first.
A system without these fields has not been researched yet. That says nothing about the system.
Read the methodCompany records and public announcements
Similar systems
- TeamtailorSwedish-built
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- VarbiSwedish-built
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- ReachMeeSwedish-builtAbsorbed into another product
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- Visma RecruitSwedish-built
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
- JobylonSwedish-built
Same origin and same kind of buyer.
Similarity is based on origin, size band and observed sector mix. It is not a ranking.
Same owner: Talentech. Varbi and ReachMee are sold by the same company.
Measured in Swedish job ad data
Where this comes from
Job ad data from public job boards and career sites.
Last recomputed 20 Sep 2026. Every figure here is derived from source data and recomputed on a schedule, never hand-edited.
No paid placement, no affiliate commission and no sponsored slots. The order on this page follows measured data or the alphabet, and nothing else.
The registry never claims that an employer does not use a particular system. We can name the system for well under half of employers, so a claim like that would often be wrong.
